UPROOTING THE TREE OF LIFE.

Why did we ever think that there was a common ancestor of all living things on Earth? Why did we entertain even such exaggerated myths that there was a single original cell? We told stories such as the following: we shed millions of dead skin cells every day, each of which is a straight-line descendant of the first cell that ever lived. This claim has been proved to be absurd by a recent article by W. Ford Doolittle in Scientific American, February 2000, pp. 90-95.

We knew that bacteria freely swap genes, rather than following the strictly vertical-descent lines of sexual reproduction. But it took detailed DNA-comparison studies to show definitely that in the bacterial superkingdom there are complex genetic networks, not vertical trees of genetic descent. Species are ill-defined in this realm; kinship links are horizontal as well as vertical, with diagonal crosslinks as well. That is the substructure, the bottom “mush”, under the proper Eukaryotic “trees of life”. Sex was a belated invention of the Protists and Fungi, carrying on then to Plants and Animals. The tree is supported by a crosslinked net of roots.

Lateral gene transfer is like lateral thinking. Why did living forms give it up for mere sex? It could have been even more productive of novelty.

Hanna Newcombe

[ How Things Come Together > > Life ]